Tag Archives: solidarity

Glasgow Film Festival: Patriots Day

featured42


Published by Glasgowist.

Patriots Day, directed and co-written by Peter Berg, is electrifying, violent, unnerving, and thoughtful – emerging as an unprecedented highlight of the Glasgow Film Festival.

The film documents the Boston Marathon bombings and the city-wide manhunt that ensued when two bombs were detonated 12 seconds apart on April 15, 2013. Considering how recent this tragedy was – in which three people were killed and several more receiving lifechanging injuries – the wounds are, understandably, still raw. But Patriots Day honours Boston with a faithful, respectful, and commendable tribute to their bravery and solidarity.

Interspersing the film throughout with real footage from CCTV cameras, helicopters, and drones, Berg gives the film an utterly chilling, unnerving, and authentic edge. Particularly, the sequence of a minute’s silence for the Newtown massacre victims before the marathon’s opening gunfire creates a nail-biting, suspenseful calm before the storm which is beautifully executed.

In the film’s introduction, we meet the no-nonsense, lovable rouge cop Tommy Saunders (Mark Wahlberg) whose talents are seemingly wasted when he is sent to marshal the race following a suspension for allegedly assaulting a fellow officer.

Boston-born Wahlberg is a true revelation as he portrays a tough guy with heart, humour, and grit who saves lives and takes charge, despite his own fear, in a situation of true chaos. As the film’s lead protagonist, Tommy takes on a leader’s role, confronting the FBI (headed up by a superb Kevin Bacon as Special Agent Richard DesLauriers) on their flawed practice, and insisting on the merit of his own profound understanding of Boston’s people and his knowledge of the city’s geography.

In the leadup to the explosions, we are offered glimpses into the lives of ordinary people – a married couple, Patrick Downes and Jessica Kensky, and a father and his young son – who we realise will soon be affected by the tragedy that is mere minutes away. A succession of moments of increasing volume, excitement, and movement that quickly disperse into quiet allow for palpable tension to build and build to an almost unbearable level until the moment of the explosions comes.

Following the thrilling panic of the attacks, Berg provides a thorough, detailed re-enactment of the complex manhunt that followed with a close look at the FBI’s recreation of the event, their efforts to fine comb through CCTV as well as footage and images from the public, and how they utilised anti-terror technology to track down those responsible.

In a gripping, climatic, and, literally, explosive showdown between police, and terrorists Tamerlan Tsarnaev (Themo Melikidze) and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (Alex Wolff), the brothers plan their mission to travel to New York to detonate more bombs, kill more civilians, and become martyrs. Melikidze is outstanding and chilling in his portrayal of a determined, callous, ice-cold killer. Wolff, too, is excellent as a brainwashed layabout watching bomb-making tutorials like they are videogames – a character so detached from reality that he texts his friends ‘LOL’ when they question why his image is all over the news.

With excellent direction and casting, Patriots Day doesn’t glorify American heroes, glamorise war, or demonise villains. It paints the real heroes as the people of Boston themselves who came together to help friends, family, neighbours, and strangers in their time of need.

The film illustrates the resilience of the human spirit and the kneejerk reaction of overwhelmingly love, not hate. It is an appropriate homage to Boston Strong and a reminder of how an entire city that was shook, terrified, and completely shut down, came together to support each other instead of rushing to hate.

In a genius conclusion, real-life survivors of the attack, including Patrick Downes and Jessica Kensky, and members of the police service and the FBI give their thoughts on that day and the impact it has had. A particularly moving moment is when Kensky describes the tragedy as the worst and best time of their lives as we see her and her husband embrace in tears as they finish the marathon on prosthetic legs for the first time since the bombings.

Patriots Day is about just that, patriotism. It’s about American spirit, resilience, and solidarity. It’s about pride, community, and strength in the face of adversity. But the overriding message of the film is that these barbaric acts of brutality, violence, and terrorism that happen in cities around the world do not succeed in causing the immense hateful reaction they are intended to incite. Instead, they bring civilians together and evoke an unrivalled, awe-inspiring level of humanity, kindness, and love.

★★★★★

What did you think of this review? Let me know in the comment section below.

The Absurdity of Blood Donation Restrictions for Gay Men After the Orlando Shooting

Featured(25)


Published by The Huffington Post.

In the wake of the tragic mass shooting at Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, on June 12, in which 49 LGBT+ individuals were killed and 53 injured, many questions have been raised about how this vicious hate crime was allowed to happen and how its kind can be prevented in the future. Gun laws in America have been debated ferociously in the last few years and even more so now as 13,286 people were killed and 26,819 injured by firearms in the US in 2015 alone. While gun control and background checks on gun buyers are being widely criticised, many have also been outraged following the shooting in Orlando for a very different reason.

In the aftermath of such a tragedy, it’s only natural for everyone, particularly members of the LGBT+ community, to want to do something, anything, to aid those who have been injured. A great way to help those still wounded and, in some cases, fighting for their lives in hospital is to donate blood, which many people in Orlando have been queuing up in streets to do. It is absurd, however, that one group of people is yet again being segregated in the process: gay men.

Despite the urgent need for donations, homosexual and bisexual men who have been sexually active within the last year are still not being allowed to donate blood; and, furthermore, are being refused the opportunity to show solidarity and much needed support for fellow members of the LGBT+ community injured in this hateful attack.

The outdated and discriminatory restrictions on gay men giving blood, which were established in the early 1980s as a panicked reaction to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, unequivocally show that homophobia is not something now only kept alive by a tiny minority of fanatics and religious extremists, but something that is deeply embedded within our society and our institutions. It shows the painful irony that the homophobia which motivated 29-year-old gunman Omar Mateen to open fire on innocent people is the same homophobia quietly ingrained in our health services that is restricting men who have sex with men from donating to those suffering as a result of this mass homophobic attack by so-called Islamic State.

At this very moment in America, it is easier for a member of the public to obtain a firearm capable of killing and wounding hundreds of people than it is for a sexually active monogamous gay man to donate blood.

 

Although there used to be a complete ban on gay men giving blood, these rules were changed in America on December 21, 2015, as the FDA issued guidance for the deferral of donations from men who have sex with men and allowed them to donate blood after remaining celibate for one year. While appearing to be a step forward in the eradication of these old rules which, according to the American Medical Association, were discriminatory and without a solid scientific justification, men who have sex with men are still being discriminated against based on their sexual behaviour, something that heterosexual men who wish to donate blood are not judged on.

On this basis, a heterosexual man who has unprotected sex with several partners would be allowed to give blood, while a homosexual man in a monogamous relationship would be refused. When examined from this angle, the restrictions on men in same-sex relationships giving blood still appear to be based on the stigma of sexual promiscuity attached to gay men, showing that the eligibility of gay men to donate blood does appear to be based on their sexual history while the eligibility to donate for straight men is not scrutinised in this way.

In the UK, our health service has similar restrictions on blood donation as the NHS Blood and Transplant service also have a year-long deferral on men who have sex with men giving blood. The NHS claim this decision ‘isn’t discriminatory’ and is not ‘based on anyone’s sexual history or sexuality’ but that the guidelines recommended by the Department of Health merely ‘reflect statistical risks for the sexual behaviour that increases the risk of virus transmission’.

 

While stating that the restrictions are not based on sexual history and then contradicting that statement in the same breath, we can see that our health services and organisations here in the UK, too, despite their objections, seem to be basing the eligibility to give blood on an outdated and backwards stigma attached to homosexual and bisexual men.

As some countries like Argentina have completely lifted the ban on men in same-sex relationships giving blood and have recognised that this decision is ‘scientifically and technically accurate‘, the restrictions on blood donations still in place in America, Britain and in many countries around the world serve as a reminder that religious and societal homophobia is continuing to cloud people’s judgement, fuel hatred and social stigma, and inspire violence.

As we come to terms with the tragic loss of life and continue to express our solidarity and support with the victims of the Orlando shooting in the face of mindless homophobia and terrorism, these discriminatory rules are being brought into question and scrutinised under the public spotlight now more than ever before, as we ask ourselves: what is the real reason why a monogamous gay man cannot give blood while a heterosexual man with an indeterminate number of sexual partners would be welcome to donate?

What do you think of the restrictions on gay men giving blood? Let me know in the comment section below.

Guest Blog: “A Kenyan Perspective on the Paris Terror Attack” by Nessa Shera

Introducing ‘moon child‘ guest blogger: Nessa Shera!

Bio PictureMy name is Nessa Shera, I am a law student and blogger from Kenya. As an immense lover of coffee, I plan on becoming a barista someday. I enjoy writing article pieces that generally mirror my own interests. When I’m not writing, I enjoy reading, listening to music, and eating out.

You can follow Nessa on her blog, Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.


 

Featured (15)

“A Kenyan Perspective on the Paris Terror Attack” by Nessa Shera

It had, for the most part, been an uneventful day that Sunday. The only thing I looked forward to was a café latte I had bought earlier that was sitting on the table across from me. I relished in the aroma of the coffee as I picked it up to take another sip. It worked great with the rain outside. With the coffee in one hand and my phone in the other, I thought I might as well make use of the Wi-Fi and kill time.

I headed to my Facebook to, well to do what everyone does when they’re on Facebook. Several posts that day either involved people changing their profile pictures – which included placing the French Flag filter – or just particular thoughts concerning the Paris terror attack. Mind you, these were mostly Kenyan Facebook friends, which went to show how much of a global catastrophe the events that occurred in Paris had become.

As I continued to scroll down, a particular post got my attention. It read: “This French Flag debacle is not because they ‘didn’t show us the same sympathy’ or whatever. Firstly, what people are doing is selective sympathy. When 4 children were killed in a bomb attack by the Israeli military while they played on the beach, no lips were moved…” I clicked like because I agreed with the message. I sympathise for the 128 plus people who died during the attacks in Paris. But what of the hundreds who were victims throughout other parts of the world?

picture 1
.

As a Kenyan, my country has also faced its share of terror attacks, one of them being the Westgate Mall Incident. A mall – that was literally 15 minutes away from my home – was invaded by the Al Shabab on the 21st September 2013, killing up to 67 people and wounding 175.

I remember security helicopters flying over my house every hour or so, and later discovering that my neighbor died in the attack. This was followed by the Garrisa University Assault on April 2, 2015, which left 148 students dead, and injuring more than 79 others. That is more than 200 people dead, and never once was there a Kenyan Flag filter on a Facebook profile picture, a hastag #PrayForKenya, or extensive global news coverage on the matter.

I do not only mourn for Kenya, but all the other countries that have suffered and did not receive due concern from the rest of the world.

picture 2
.

At this point, my café latte was coming to its end and I desperately attempted to prolong the last few sips before accepting that it was over. As I finished, I thought: terrorism is a global epidemic that has caused the deaths of thousands, while leaving many more grieving and adversely affected. So, let’s not just pray for France, but pray for the world.


 

A few words from the primary blogger – I am delighted to be featuring this guest blog on ‘moon child’. When the Paris attacks first happened, I, like many others, switched my profile picture on Facebook to one with a filter of the French flag. But soon, after I learned about the other attacks happening around the world that were getting little to no media attention, I decided to remove the filter. This wasn’t because I lost sympathy for those in Paris but because I want to show solidarity with the entire world, not just one country, to stand up against terrorism.

Nessa’s excellent piece captures her views on the subject while mixing in a lovely creative nonfiction style with the image of her in a cafe drinking coffee.

If you’d like to guest blog for ‘moon child’, visit the guest blogging page for more information.

Featured image courtesy of Bart via Flickr. Edited by Sophie McNaughton.

What do you think about the global terrorism crisis? Let us know in the comment section below.

Dismantling Islamophobia: The Qur’an According to Muslims – CultNoise Project

Featured (14)

After the Paris attacks, I came up with the idea to compile a collection of quotes and stories from Muslims and/or people who have studied the Qur’an to address and dismantle the onslaught of Islamophobia being directed an innocent Muslims and refugees who are being wrongly associated with terrorism. We got some great and really fascinating quotes after appeaing for contributors and I hope everyone enjoys reading them. If you have any thoughts, please let me know in the comment section below.

A big thank you to Matt Sloan and Rania Mattar from CultNoise for helping me put the piece together, and thank you to the people who contributed.


 

Published by CultNoise magazine.

In the wake of the Paris terror attacks last week (November 13), we have unfortunately, but sadly not surprisingly, seen a huge backlash against the Muslim community with everything from ignorant and abusive posts on social media, to news reports of racially motivated assaults against innocent Muslims. In response to the onslaught of Islamophobia that followed the attacks, CultNoise appealed to readers who are Muslim and/or have studied the Qur’an to tell us what the religion of Islam truly stands for.

In order to illustrate that no religion is inherently good or evil, it’s down to how people choose to interpret it, we asked our readers to share their stories and interpretations of Islam to create a genuine and accurate picture of the religion. We at CultNoise believe that all forms of discrimination are unacceptable, and Islamophobia, too, should not be tolerated. ISIS and other extremist groups are not representative of Islam or any other religion, as our contributors told us:


“The representation of Islam in my last twenty years of comprehension has become so warped, that I myself find it difficult to have my single voice of reason heard in a sea of Islamophobia.

Throughout history and recent times, it is evident that our Western politicians need to find and infamously hail a scapegoat. In our current affairs, it seems to be Muslims and Islam.

‘Whoever kills a human being it shall be as if he has killed all of mankind, and whoever so saves the life of one, it shall be as if he saved the life of all mankind.‘ – Chapter 5; verse 32, Qur’an.

This is the single sentence that cannot be emphasised, highlighted, shared and understood enough.

Islam is a religion that perpetuates peace and love among brothers and sisters, a phrase that the right wing and Islamophobes are tired of hearing and have never believed in. Regardless, I’ll still continue to write and share and educate those around me who are ignorant as best as possible. I’ll try not to hold my breath, and thrust my head into my hands with frustration and preparation of my defence, my condemning of a terror act, anytime I hear or see of an attack. I’ll keep doing so and hopefully my sisters, aged 3 and 6-years-old, won’t have to endure bullying for their skin colour or religion. They won’t have to deal with offensive language scrawled in black marker on their front doors. Hopefully, those will be incidents that voices like mine can end.”

– Sidrah Choudhry, full-time international politics student


“The Qur’an 6:151 says: ‘…and do not kill a soul that God has made sacrosanct, save lawfully,’ i.e. murder is forbidden but the death penalty imposed by the state for a crime is permitted.

5:53 says: ‘…whoso kills a soul, unless it be for murder or for wreaking corruption in the land, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind; and he who saves a life, it shall be as if he had given life to all mankind.’

This is the most important point in the Qur’an discussing how murder is strictly forbidden.”

– Nora Adlouni, CultNoise writer


Untitled design (12)


“The Qur’an does not condone violence. I have studied the Qur’an and Islamic sciences growing up for more than 12 years. I don’t identify with a lot of the teachings anymore. But it’s fair to say that Islam, like most religions out there, aims to establish an ethical code through which people can coexist in peace and harmony.

Generally speaking, many verses in the Qur’an promote peace and see it as the ultimate goal. It would be disingenuous, however, to say that there aren’t verses that condone violence. They are explicitly applicable to specific situations. And some verses are just plain intolerance and cruelty. However, in this sense, the Qur’an is not any different than any other ancient text – the Bible for instance – in which the portrayed God takes a very rigid stance on many subjects, such as homosexuality, extramarital relationships and many other topics.

Trying to prove, however, that there are no parts of the Qur’an that condone violence would be like trying to prove that the Bible does not condone violence. But any sensible person who reads the Bible would say that by today’s standards, some parts of it do. And the same goes for the Qur’an. But the overall message is a message of peace, and the overall objective of the religion is to be an ethical guide.  

In the context of taking innocent lives, the Qur’an’s standpoint is in Surah 5 Verse 32: ‘…whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land – it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one – it is as if he had saved mankind entirely.’ But even in this verse, where the Qur’an makes it a heinous crime to take a life, it does make exceptions: ‘…unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land.’ And this is what the radicals feed on. Because that part is open to interpretation to some extent. But I think ultimately, if someone wants to commit evil, then they would interpret anything as a message of evil.”

– Mohamed Arab, Heriot-Watt University

Mohamed’s views are his own and not representative of his employer.


What does the Qur’an mean to you? Let us know in the comment section below.

Featured image courtesy of Muhammad Ghouri via Flickr.