Tag Archives: britain

Guest Blog: “An English Girl’s View on Scottish Independence” by Sophie Dishman

Introducing ‘moon child’ guest blogger: Sophie Dishman!

11429872_804417526332227_2152456830230444518_nI am a 21 year old student studying Journalism at the University of Sunderland. I have a keen interest in politics and international relations as well as mental health, carers issues and disability.

I am also a blogger and Youtuber, writing and talking about my experiences of being a student and more. I have keen interests in all areas of journalism, but my particular favourites are radio, print and online journalism.

Previous to studying journalism, I was a social work student at the same university.

You can follow Sophie’s work on her blog Musings of a Journalism Student, on her Twitter and Facebook profiles and YouTube channel.


Guest Blog- -An English Girl's View on Scottish Independence- By Sophie Dishman

“An English Girl’s View on Scottish Independence” by Sophie Dishman

It’s just over a year since the Scottish Independence Referendum. A whole year on since Scotland said ‘No’ to becoming independent from the rest of the UK. I have to admit that I’m not entirely knowledgeable in this particular area of politics, so you will have to bear with me on that one.

What I do know is that for people in England, we were waiting. Waiting with anticipation. I cared about what happened. I used to live near Scotland so you could say I had some vested interest. People over the age of 16 were able to vote in the referendum (something I would love to happen in England too) and to contribute towards the decision that would affect the future of their country.

Devolution of power is a controversial subject anywhere in the UK. Some people want power devolved to local councils, others want London to control all of the money. That’s where opinion is split. Scotland wanted a majority devolution of power, whilst keeping the monarchy and the pound. In England, or in my own little world, I like the pound and I like the monarchy, but I want power to go to my local council to decide where the money is spent. I want them to hold the purse strings.

However, if I lived in Scotland, I think I would have voted to stay in the UK. I think the people of Scotland benefit a lot from being with the UK – free university education if you study in Scotland being one of them. London provides Scotland with the money to do that. Why would you want to leave? That is just my opinion though. I’ve never lived in or visited Scotland (but I will someday!) so my perspective is a little limited.

I should mention the First Minister of Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon and of course, SNP’s Mhairi Black, the youngest MP in Parliament for 100 years. Two powerful women, I may add. Nicola championed the ‘Yes’ camp, along with the then First Minister of Scotland Alex Salmond, campaigning for Scotland to be removed from the UK so it could stand on its own two feet. That was Nicola Sturgeon’s belief and she stuck to it. Mhairi Black on the other hand is championing the voice of young people. To be honest, these are two of the most identifiable people in Parliament at the moment, besides the Prime Minister David Cameron and Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne.

So in short, I did care about the referendum. But I don’t think it would have affected me personally to a great extent. I think that Nicola Sturgeon had a great campaign, but evidently it wasn’t meant to be. Maybe next time?


A few words from the primary blogger – I chose to feature a guest blog by Sophie because I think she is an extremely talented writer and journalist. I love Sophie’s blog and even though she has only just started her journalism degree, she already has a huge head start as she has created an excellent portfolio of work for great causes including mental health and carers issues.

You can also read Sophie’s blog post where I feature in herA Day in the Life Series” to talk about my experience as a Creative Degree Student.

If you’d like to guest blog for ‘moon child’, visit the guest blogging page for more information.

Featured image made on Canva by Sophie McNaughton.

What do you think about Scottish Independence? Let us know in the comment section below.

Film Review: Legend

Published by Student Rag.

People are often surprised to hear that I’m a huge fan of gangster films. I love them so much that I even have a huge make-shift canvas up on my wall featuring characters from Scarface, Goodfellas, The Godfather and many more all gathered round a poker table. But one of my all-time favourite gangster movies is The Krays; the chilling and eerie but stunning 1990 film starring brothers Martin and Gary Kemp which tells the rise and fall chronicle of the notorious Kray twins who dominated London in a reign of violence and intimidation in the 1960s.

Considering how much I adore the original film adaptation based on the book ‘The Profession of Violence: The Rise and Fall of the Kray twins’, I was a bit precious about the idea of a re-make, but when I heard Tom Hardy would be starring as both Ronald “Ronnie” (“the one man mob”) and Reginald “Reggie” Kray (“the gangster prince of the East End”) – an impressive feat in itself, if achieved – I was intrigued to see how this re-telling of the story of Britain’s most infamous-gangsters-turned-surprising-national-treasures would pan out.

Legend is a revitalised, re-energised take on the Krays twins’ story with impeccably glitzy costume and set design that could easily rival the nostalgic, stunning look of The Great Gatsby (2013). The class, suave style and sexiness of the film is instantly apparent as the movie opens with Reggie (the front) and Ronnie (the muscle) smoking cigars in the back of a chauffeur driven car driving through star-studded, swinging ‘60s London with a Cockney voice over from Reggie’s wife, Frances Kray (maiden name: Shea).

The real Ronnie and Reggie with Frances.

While this indulgence in the glamourized East End folklore of the twins may not be an entirely explicit, graphic and wholly honest portrayal of the Krays – figures who have been mythologized and turned into iconic, nostalgic characters of 1960s Britannia – no critic can deny that this film is still a brutal, spunky, unapologetic adaptation which might make audiences laugh at times but which also ponders sobering questions, particularly regarding the mental health issues and wellbeing of Ronnie Kray, who was eventually certified insane and became a patient of Broadmoor psychiatric hospital (an aspect of his life that the 1990 does not touch on, and instead portrays Ronnie as merely a lover of violence).

Although the narrator of the film, Frances, died from suicide not long after she and Reggie married (a piece of trivia I already knew from the 1990 film), I thought it was an inspired touch on behalf of the director to have the film concentrate on the story from her perspective; the movie is very much focalised on the beloved Reggie Kray through the eyes of Frances, and, essentially, from beyond the grave.

Shown, to a certain degree, as caricature portrayals of each twin, Tom Hardy delivers two engrossing and compelling performances as – similar to the tale of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde – Hardy is able to switch personality from the softly-spoken, handsome, gentlemanly and intelligent yet still violent and not-to-be-messed-with Reggie Kray, into his vicious counterpart: the paranoid-schizophrenic, blood-thirsty, unpredictable and terrifyingly violent yet hilarious, Ronnie Kray.

With subtle characterisations and mannerisms including: Ronnie’s deeper voice; how he breathes heavily and shows his bottom row of teeth more than the top; how he wobbles and swaggers with a fat cigar in his hand; and Reggie’s way of slicking back his hair; placing a protective hand on the small of Frances’ back wherever they go; and his sweet, innocent, butter-wouldn’t-melt voice, Hardy hones the characteristics of these two very similar but paradoxically very different brothers to create two vivid, rich, multidimensional performances.

Following the twins rise as they buy and run clubs in London (gained largely through intimidation), make contacts with the big boys of Las Vegas and become socialites and even celebrities of 1960s pop culture, we then see their empire begin to crumble around them as Ronnie’s side-splitting one liners (“I prefer boys. Mostly Italian but I’m not prejudiced. And I’m the giver, not the receiver. There’s a different, you know – I ain’t a faggot.”) fade and he becomes increasingly violent, paranoid and unable to be controlled by anyone other than his brother and with rival gangsters and the police baying for Kray blood, Reggie, too, begins to crack under the pressure and violently lashes out on poor Frances with the audience watching on in horror as he comes more and more like his psychopathic brother.

With an explosive, ferocious and climactic scene towards the end of the film as Reggie snaps and repeatedly stabs fellow notorious gangland figure Jack “the Hat” McVitie to death in a crowded room at an East End party, we see Frances’ beloved Reggie turn into a monster while his ‘evil twin’ brother remains calm and asks him “what’d you do that for?” – a surreal, role-reversal exchange spookily similar to an earlier one in the film between the brothers, but this time Ronnie is the sensible voice of reason and Reggie is the wild animal covered in another man’s blood.

For the critics who sneer and have been slating Legend because of its slightly cartoonish, embellished and perhaps a little generalised portrayal of the Krays, I can partly understand their aversion. But I, like many others, thoroughly enjoyed this sophisticated, violent, art-house-with-a-big-budget depiction of London’s most infamous criminals and it is definitely a film I would recommend to gangster-film-virgins and dire-hard-fans alike.

Legend is out in cinemas now.

Have you seen the film? Let us know what you thought of it in the comments section below.

Guest Blog: “Comparative Racism” by Ellen Hawley

Introducing moon child guest blogger: Ellen Hawley!

_DSC8612My name is Ellen Hawley and I am an American living in Britain. I have published three novels: The Divorce Diet (Kensington Press; 2015), Open Line (Coffee House Press; 2008), and Trip Sheets (Milkweed Editions; 1998).

I blog at Notes from the U.K. and have worked as an editor, a cab driver, a radio talk show host, a janitor, an assembler, a file clerk, and for four fun-filled hours a receptionist. I have also taught writing. I have never worked as a lion tamer and, at this stage in life, I am unlikely to.

You can also follow Ellen’s work on her website.


“Comparative Racism” by Ellen Hawley

For better and for worse, the US has a reputation. Big cars, loud voices, outsize promises. It’s the place British writers send a character when they can’t resolve his or her situation at home and they’re not willing to write a tragic ending. It promises freedom, opportunity, vast stretches of land. And – oops – racism. We’re known for that too.

I say “we” because although I live in Cornwall and have become a British citizen, I was born and raised in the U.S. Ask me my nationality and the odds are I’ll say “American” before I remember that I have two.

Our American version of original sin was stealing the land from the Native Americans, and we compounded that by basing our developing economy on slavery. But injustice is never stable, so we needed laws, police forces, armies, vigilante groups, everyday beliefs, and religious interpretations to keep all the pieces—and the people—in their places. Racism sank it roots deep into our culture and our consciousness. Hundreds of years later, no one grows up there unaffected by it.

All of which you may already know. I don’t know you and it’s hard to know where to start anyway. The topic’s huge. I’ve started this essay three times already. Even a small chunk of the topic is more than I can do justice to. Sophie lives in Scotland, though, and asked me what racism’s like in the U.S. Since I don’t know where you – her readers – live, I’ll address her question as best I can and hope it’s of some use to you.

What’s the U.S. like now that we’re all officially free and equal? The laws designed to keep the races separate and unequal have been repealed and the army no longer fights the Native American tribes, but we live with our history. Here’s a quick and wildly incomplete report.

Back in the mid-1960s when I went out with a black man (I’m white), heads turned when we walked down the street. Literally: If I looked behind us, I’d often find that people had turned to stare once they thought we wouldn’t notice. Some didn’t wait that long. And that was in cosmopolitan New York. In parts of the South, he could easily have been killed for going out with me. Or walking down the street with me, regardless of what our relationship was or wasn’t.

Today. the shock is gone and the physical threat is gone. White families that would once have turned their backs on a mixed-race descendant now include and treasure them. (I use the phrases race and mixed race for lack of anything better; race is a myth, and I know it.) In some families that happened easily and in others it was a battle, but it happened all the same. I’m sure a few families are exceptions, but I’d bet not that many. Of the ones who include and treasure, not all are wise enough to do it well, but change is never smooth and easy, and this is a change. A small but also a huge one.

Times change, and it’s always personal.

I should add that my experience comes from the North. Parts of the South may not have gotten around to taking it in their stride yet.

Another thing that’s changed is that racial name calling now carries a social stigma and people who indulge in it complain about that, waving the banner of free speech; although the people shutting them up are exercising their free speech as surely as the name-callers are. Nothing in the Constitution guarantees the right to not hear it from other people when they think you’re an asshole. What the Constitution says about free speech is that Congress shall make no law abridging it. It’s not Congress that’s holding the name-callers back, it’s public opinion, and that really, really pisses them off.

But in spite the changes in law and culture, the average income of blacks and Native Americans is far lower than that of whites. Segregation of schools and neighborhoods continues, although no law enforces it. Some horrifying percent of young black men are in prison, and having been convicted of felonies will never vote or get a decent job (if they ever had one to begin with) again. Blacks are more likely to be stopped by the police, beaten by the police, killed by the police, and charged with more serious offenses for the same cause. Forgive me if I don’t trot out statistics. I’m a disaster with numbers. If you want them, they’re there to be found.

Not that many years ago, someone did a study of hiring practices by sending out two versions of the same resumes, one with a name that sounded African-American, the other with one that could assume was white. Guess which one wasn’t offered an interview? I don’t know how many they sent out – again, you don’t want to trust me around numbers – but enough to see a pattern.

We’re none of us out from under the shadow.

So we have a body of black people who don’t see any way to get at the American dream. Predictably, they’re angry. The Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s raised hopes and changed some things, but not enough. When the tide of hope receded, it left a ring of bitterness. Do you know the Langston Hughes poem: What Happens to a Dream Deferred?

Does it dry up
like a raisin in the sun?
Or fester like a sore—
And then run?
Does it stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over—
like a syrupy sweet?

Maybe it just sags
like a heavy load.

Or does it explode?

If you’re white, you can live your entire life in the same country and never know what it’s like to live there in a black or brown skin, and you can manage not to know what they’re so angry about. Slavery ended a long time ago. What’s their problem?

I sound like I’m being a wise-ass there. I am a wise-ass, but I’ve seen those words, written in not quite that order. As a serious question or statement.

We also have a body of whites who feel aggrieved by what has changed. They can’t forgive Obama for being (a) black and (b) the president. Some of them will say that outright and others won’t, but either way he just drives them nuts. Their sense of grievance is wider and deeper than just Obama, but that’s enough to give you a sense of it. Huge topic. Limited space. We’ll stop with that one example. When a group loses its privileged position – or even a small part of it – its members aren’t all going to smile and say, “Well, that’s a relief” – although an enlightened few may.

You’ve heard about the young black man shot by the police in Ferguson, Missouri, and about the fury that sparked. You may have heard about Trayvon Martin, an unarmed seventeen-year-old, shot by a vigilante who, having been charged with second-degree murder, was acquitted. The list goes on. With social media, suddenly it’s possible to track these incidents, to put them together, to start a #BlackLivesMatter movement. That’s part of the American reality. It’s not new, but the wider world is finally hearing about it.

Sophie asks if the U.S. is being demonized (actually, she said “demonised”) by the media stories. I wouldn’t say so. What you’re reading and hearing is true. We’re talking about a country built over a deep pool of bitterness, and we live at a time when it’s found a way to the surface. It’s not a pretty sight, but then it’s not a pretty reality. Making it visible may – just may – mean we stand any chance of changing a few more things.


A few words from the primary blogger – I chose to feature a piece by Ellen because I found her work, particularly her blog post on the Cornwall Gay Pride, to be truly fascinating, intelligent and sophisticated. Ellen’s writing has an exceptional way of reveering the reader; to open their mind to new perspectives they may not have considered.

After talking with Ellen, we decided that a piece on comparative racism would make an interesting guest blog post and this piece is truly excellent. It begs a lot of questions about not only racism in America but racism all around the world, and furthermore encourages the reader ponder on their own humanity. This piece is very sobering, evocative and thought-provoking, and I can’t thank Ellen enough for allowing this piece to be featured on ‘moon child’.

Featured image courtesy of Ted Eytan via Flickr.

If you’d like to guest blog for ‘moon child’, visit the guest blogging page for more information.

10 Reasons to Love Mhairi Black

Read my latest CultNoise magazine article on 10 Reasons to Love SNP MP Mhairi Black:

Since 2014, we have seen a huge surge in public interest in politics, particularly amongst young people. Rather than young people being typically disinterested with the political world, they are now making it their business to fight for a better government and a better society.

The political landscape in Scotland has changed dramatically within the last year with the Scottish National Party (SNP) experiencing a landslide in support and winning a staggering 56 seats at Westminster in May’s General Election; something which has never been done by any other party before. One of the politicians at the helm of this new wave of politics in Scotland is Britain’s new youngest MP, Mhairi Black.

Continue reading 10 Reasons to Love Mhairi Black