Why the T2 Trainspotting Ending is Genius

Featured(54)


As Vladimir Nabokov once said: ‘Genius is finding the invisible link between things.’

With the DVD of T2 Trainspotting being released this month, allowing hardcore fans and phenomenon newbies alike to relish in 30+ minutes of unseen footage and cast interviews, the ending to the long-awaited sequel is a hot topic of conversation.

Loosely based on Porno, Irvine Welsh’s sequel to his 1993 novel Trainspotting, director Danny Boyle and original screenwriter John Hodge worked their magic again by fine-combing the novel to cherry-pick scenes for T2 Trainspotting; one such scene being Renton and Simon’s already iconic 1690 scam in an Orange Hall. Mixing choice scenes from Welsh’s sequel with a brand-new plot focussing on nostalgia, masculinity and getting older, Hodge wrote an inventive script which was an instant hit with Boyle and the original cast, Ewan McGregor, Ewen Bremner, Robert Carlyle and Jonny Lee Miller.

Although McGregor’s character, Mark Renton, is the lead protagonist of Welsh’s novel and the articulate antihero narrator of Boyle’s hugely successful 1996 film adaptation, the character focalisation shifts slightly in T2 Trainspotting to Bremner’s character, Danny ‘Spud’ Murphy.

A baby-faced old man in a serious long-term relationship with heroin, the initial worry for Spud is that he won’t survive a sequel and those fears are almost realised when the audience sees Spud preparing to take his own life – the first scene in the franchise to be narrated by a character other than Renton. And while Renton has his resourcefulness and a new life in Amsterdam, Simon has a network of scams and a (failing) pub to run, and Begbie has burglaries to commit and unfinished business to take care of, Spud has nothing – nothing except his stories.

 

Being by no means perfect, Spud has, nevertheless, always been the moral compass of the franchise; the only friend who Renton loved and felt obliged to compensate after his devastating betrayal at the end of Trainspotting because Spud had ‘never hurt anybody’. As the sequel continually poses the question of what will happen to this lovable goof, Hodge’s ingenious twist gives Spud a new lease of (or should I say, ‘lust for’?) life. After spending his time between sauna refurbishments scribbling down stories from his early-twenties, Spud eventually combines them to create makeshift novel to be read by his new friend Veronica and the love of his life and mother of his son, Gail.

The ending of T2 Trainspotting does well to make the audience emotional by revisiting each character and the note they end on, but there is something particularly emotive and special about Gail, portrayed by the brilliant Shirley Henderson, rearranging Spud’s papers after reading and saying, ‘I thought of a title’ – a moment that made even Ewan McGregor get tear up. Combined with the numerous self-reflexive moments alluding to the first film and Welsh’s novels, the lightbulb suddenly clicks on when the audience realises the reason behind Hodge’s ingenious meta references throughout as he implies that Spud represents Irvine Welsh himself.

Talking to The Telegraph in 2015, Welsh said: ‘The game changer was getting seriously addicted to heroin in my early 20s. I didn’t have any money to lose, so for about a year I got into the dark world of scams and multiple giro claims, petty shoplifting and theft. I was constantly borrowing from people and running up debts, and that changes people’s perceptions of you.’

Just as Welsh took heroin, committed benefit fraud and theft, Spud, too, is a heroin addict who forges signatures and was even imprisoned for shoplifting. And as Renton and Simon joke about who in their right mind is going to read Spud’s stories, we smile to ourselves knowing that the whole world will.

Defying Sick Boy’s unifying theory of life which dictates that everyone who has ‘it’ ultimately loses it, the cast and crew of T2 Trainspotting definitely still have it. The conclusion makes the franchise’s down-and-out underdog a star by giving him a creative outlet that could transform his life, refuses to reward Renton for his controversial and arguably amoral behaviour despite the device of first-person narrative largely focussing on him, and brings these characters and relationships full circle.

Whether this analogy, this ‘invisible link’ between Welsh and Spud, was intended by Welsh when writing Spud or completely invented by Hodge when writing the screenplay, T2 Trainspotting’s conclusion is nevertheless a beautiful and truly satisfying ending; the ending that the fans deserved and one that pays tribute to the man who started it all.

 

What did you think of the T2 Trainspotting ending? Let me know in the comment section below.

Shelley, Welsh, Nabokov: The Dream Authors Panel with Eventbrite

Featured(53)


This week, I was inspired by Eventbrite – a platform that allows event organisers to plan, promote, and sell tickets to events and publish them on social media – to come up with my dream panel of authors, dead or alive, to hear talk about their particular genre and bestselling books.

I have used Eventbrite myself to organise the print launch for a literary magazine where I worked as an assistant editor and various other events. The site makes every area of event management simple, quick and easy and I can’t recommend it enough to anyone planning a party, club meet-up, cultural event, or conference.

For me, the headliners of my dream authors panel would have to be…

Mary Shelley

If there’s one story in the world I wish I had come up with, it’s Frankenstein. One of the first successful works of science fiction/gothic horror, Frankenstein was considered blasphemous and scandalous upon publication in 1818. Telling the story of an eccentric, obsessive scientist – desperate to discover the secret of reversing death and prolonging life – Victor Frankenstein finally succeeds in assembling a creature from dead body parts.

After bringing his monster to life, Victor is horrified by what he has done and rejects his creature, causing the monster to turn from innocent and caring to hateful and vengeful. In an ideal world, it would be great to hear Mary Shelley talk about the inspiration behind her legendary story and – since there are so many films and sequels to her book – what she believes the monster would have done next after the novel’s ambiguous, cliffhanger ending.


Irvine Welsh

Frankenstein was my favourite book until I read Trainspotting. Featuring a rotating narrative following a group of delinquents in Leith who turn to drugs, crime, and violence in an age of unemployment and bleak prospects during the Thatcherite era, Mark Renton, Simon ‘Sick Boy’ Williamson, Danny ‘Spud’ Murphy, and Francis ‘Franco’ Begbie and their mates get involved in everything from comical scrapes to harrowing tragedies. Written in Scots, the book might be a challenge for those who aren’t native speakers, but it is definitely worth a read no matter how familiar you are with dialectal speech.

The author of bestselling novels including Trainspotting, Porno, Filth and Glue, it would be great to hear Irvine Welsh speak about the Trainspotting franchise, what he thinks of the new film adaptation of his sequel to Trainspotting, and if he ever plans on revisiting Mark Renton, Sick Boy, Spud, and Begbie for one last chapter.


Vladimir Nabokov

Author of one of the most notorious banned books ever, Vladimir Nabokov wrote Lolita, a novel following unreliable narrator Humbert Humbert who is obsessively ‘in love’ with 12-year-old Dolores Haze. Seducing Lolita’s mother, Humbert becomes her stepfather and then her sole guardian when she is orphaned. Considered a classic of 20th-century literature, but controversial nonetheless, the book continues to bewilder and fascinate readers today with Stanley Kubrick adapting the story into film in 1962 and Adrian Lyne adapting the novel into film again in 1997.

I would love to be able to ask Nabokov about the process of writing such an unconventional novel and how he felt about the backlash it received. I also would have liked to hear him discuss his other works including dystopian novel Bend Sinister.

If I could have another few guest panellists, having Samuel Beckett, Herta Muller, Bram Stoker, R.L. Stevenson, Stephen King, Edgar Allan Poe, the Grimms Brothers, Angela Carter, Susanna Kaysen, and Margaret Atwood would be ideal.

Who would you have on your dream panel of authors? Let me know in the comment section below.